The Greek Strategy
by Tassos Athanassopoulos
Kyrie,
The scope of my rhetoric is to emphasize the thesis, and
not hypothesis, that strategy, as strategic analysis and synthesis,
has an anthropocentric orientation, and is of Greek origin.
Its etymology originates from « stratos » and « igesia »,
and was the master art of a scope to any nike. It is based
on the epistemological work of handling and maneuvering
all tactical data about an organization, and about all else
this organization faces in its agora. The glossary here
is Greek, as in all epistemological arts. Strategy is epistemological
as it is rational, and an art as it is a face of the reality.
Its absolute reason for existence is the dramatic and
severe shaking an organization realises in its forum by
the practices of its antagonists. In analogy, it is based on the
very basis, and the basic hypothesis of, economics.
Strategy, as described in my prologue, synonymous to planning,
is not a panacea in itself; it is rather a policy. It is professed
as a systemic, systematic and epistemological mode of a
microscopic and a macroscopic analysis of an organization: its system
parameters are analyses in an ideal reproduction -in an
iconic scheme- of the antagonism in its periphery; then, a synthesis
or mixing of options is concluded into different annual
or omni-present plans, with which it will face the idiosyncratic
monopolistic, oligopolistic, or complex dynamic and polymorphous,
cataclysmic competition in its menace. All organizations dance
in their idiomorphic and heterogeneous economic and political
fora as athletes agonize in a marathon. An organization then, has
to maintain an orthodox strategy if it is not to be traumatized
by its competitors, with a gnomon to harmonize its production
in a skeptical and eclectic piloting of its army, facing
the antithesis of the stranger organizations
It is an anathema for all organizations who imitate their competitors
as idols, to be stigmatized in apology to their archons, conclude
to sporadic and periodic paralysis and utopian nomad practices,
and face a catastrophic exodus. Organizations that do not manage
to estimate the anatomy of the strategy of their competitors,
discerning their strategic inclination, can not produce a competitive
management through which to economize and antagonize. Strategy
then is dilated and remembered as an Olympian program, an aristocratic
method, an esoteric organizational meditation, an oligarchic algorithm,
an apotheosis of logic. It is the anthropomorphic and anthropocentric
artery of the organization and its periscope scoping around
its perimeter. Mastering strategy illuminates organizational
problems, and liberates from a plethora of dilemmas and risks,
and from the oxymoron paradox of organizational kleistophobic
(claustrophobic) homogeneity and teratogenesis. Legend cosmopolitan
organizations of our era are characterized by dynamism, dictated
by their parallel enthusiasm in practicing strategic theory. In
antithesis, organizations of our epoch with absence of plans and
apostasy from strategy are diagnosed having symptoms of nomad
practice and melancholic politics, and syndromes of prodigal
organic ontogenesis and atopous neologisms in pandemonium. This could
be concluded by paraphrasing the Heracletian apophthegm of the prologue -a
mortal angel for such organizations-, as a periphrastic lectic
for those who are present but do not hear. For all these reasons,
strategy should be professed in all gymnasia, as it is theorized
and professed here with us.
As an epilogue Kyrie, the author sincerely apologises for tyrannising
you, his audience, with his Hellenic/Greek phraseology. The confessed
aesthetic melody of the phrases describing strategy in this
rhetoric had not a demagogue character, but maintained a sincere pedagogical
and didactic deontology, scoping to generate the magic phenomenon
of euphoria present in all those who have the opportunity to
meditate through Greek logos. My eulogies to you all who sympathize
with this reason, and my eucharists to all else.
|